RED ALERT: Biden Launches TERRIFYING New Plan… It’s BAD

Janet Yellen, U.S. Treasury Secretary, proposed taxing unrealized capital gains from billionaires’ to fund Biden’s $2 trillion spending bill – which Biden claims cost $0.

On Sunday’s CNN, Yellen supported the idea of taxing the wealthiest one percent’s unrealized capital gain. However, she claimed it is not counted as a “wealth tax.”

She said:

Um, I think what’s under consideration is a proposal that Sen. [Ron] Wyden [D-OR] and the Senate Finance Committee have been looking at that would, um, impose, um, a tax on unrealized capital gains, um, on liquid assets held by extremely wealthy individuals, billionaires.

I wouldn’t call that a wealth tax, but it would help get at capital gains, which are an extraordinarily large part of the incomes of the wealthiest individuals, and right now escape taxation until they’re realized. And often, they are only realized in a death, benefitting from a so-called step-up of basis. 

So, it’s not a wealth tax but, um, a tax on unrealized capital gains of exceptionally wealthy individuals. 

In contrast, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) called the Democrats proposed tax a “wealth tax.”

On Sunday, Pelosi told CNN, “We probably will have a wealth tax.”

According to Americans for Tax Reform, the “mark-to-market regime” would force Americans to pay taxes every year on their liquid assets — things that can be sold easily — which include things like stocks, collectibles, tchotchkes. If the liquid assets rise in value — which could be influenced by factors like rampant inflation — the owner would be required to pay a tax on the perceived higher value, before it has even been sold for actual profit. The value may not stay at that high value, however, and it is unclear whether the proposal would make up for “unrealized losses.”

The advocacy group cited a May 2021 study, finding a ratio of 3 to 1 Americans opposed taxing unrealized gains.

Researchers found in the survey with 5,000 participants:

Respondents strongly prefer to wait to tax gains on publicly traded stocks until sale versus taxing unsold gains each year: 75% to 25%. Though this opposition is strongest among those who are wealthier or own stocks, all demographic groups oppose taxing unsold gains by large margins. This opposition persists and is often strengthened when looking across a variety of other assets and policy framing.

“Even after they heard arguments in favor of this kind of taxation,” participants largely rejected the idea, according to the report, even those identifying as Democrats, and even if they did not own stocks.

“After all, taxes paid on these assets would have to come from other sources of income, not the asset itself,” Americans for Tax Reform noted. 

The study explained further:

There is significant concern that unsold gains are not yet real in a sense. As shown in Table 4, the word most distinctively associated with opponents is “actual”—as in, taxpayers have not “actually” received income “yet.” Likewise, they note that the stock has not yet yielded “cash” or anything in the taxpayer’s “hand.”

Reportedly, the proposal “completely exempts middle-class workers and their families” and “included specific exclusion for retirement accounts and family homes and farms.” According to the Wall Street Journal, less than 1,000 of America’s wealthiest would likely be affected by the tax.

Non the less, Republicans took to Twitter warning of possible results from an unrealized capital gains tax. Many were worried the federal government would eventually move the goalpost making everyday Americans pay for their unrealized gains.

On Monday, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) tweeted: “It would be naive to think that—in the long term—this will only target the wealthy. The Democrats want to get their foot in the door to tax unrealized gains. Then, they’re coming for your 401k plan.”

Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL) said, “If you tax unrealized gains, meaning you didn’t sell the stock and didn’t receive any cash, THAT IS A WEALTH TAX!!.” 

Tim Murtaugh, a GOP strategist, said, taxing “basically theoretical income before it’s actually income is nuts.”

“Here’s how insane this is: Biden proposes to tax income people haven’t even received – it’s just theoretical income they WOULD get if they sold assets,” Murtaugh continued. “And Biden would do this to pay for his mammoth plan, which, by the way, he says costs ZERO dollars. No wonder he’s tanking.”

The House is expected to vote this week on a separate $1 trillion spending bill next week.

Previous articleBREAKING: Biden CONFIRMS It – Troops Ordered To…
Next articleBOMBSHELL: Pfizer Whistleblower Goes PUBLIC with Terrifying Warning