Alex Soros, the son of George Soros, has allegedly made a veiled threat towards President Donald Trump. On X, Alex Soros shared an article from The Atlantic, a liberal news source, which featured a picture of a bullet hole alongside an image of someone holding $47 in cash.

Numerous X users have interpreted this post as a cryptic threat aimed at President Trump. According to Jim Hoft from the Gateway Pundit, the cash symbolizes billionaire Trump’s potential victory in the 2024 election, making him the 47th President of the United States. The bullet image is believed to represent an assassination.

Last year, the crime and inflation crises largely evaporated. So did the leading theories about what had caused them. https://t.co/WguJQkj1PG

— Alex Soros (@AlexanderSoros) January 22, 2024

“Last year, the crime and inflation crises largely evaporated,” the caption reads.

“So did the leading theories about what had caused them.”

Last year, the crime and inflation crises largely evaporated. So did the leading theories about what had caused them. https://t.co/WguJQkj1PG

— Alex Soros (@AlexanderSoros) January 22, 2024

In the meantime, Soros has recently returned from the annual summit of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davis, Switzerland.

During the event, Soros cautioned his fellow globalists about the perceived danger to “democracy” that Trump poses.

As reported by Slay News, the younger Soros, who assumed control of his father’s multi-billion-dollar empire last year, alerted WEF globalists that if Trump were to win re-election, it would undermine the public’s “confidence in institutions and democracy.”

According to Soros’ hesitant warning, President Trump had previously “stripped away” all of that confidence after his victory in the 2016 election.

He then proposed that individuals who are deemed “untrustworthy,” such as Trump, pose a “threat” to “democratic institutions” and “democracy.”

“The United States, like, you know, has checks and balances…and one man, Donald Trump, literally came in and just took that all away,” Soros stuttered.

In a contentious decision, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that Border Patrol agents are permitted to remove razor wire that Texas had installed along the U.S.-Mexico border, despite an ongoing legal dispute regarding the wire. The justices voted 5-4 in favor of an emergency appeal made by the Biden administration, which has been engaged in a growing confrontation with Texas over border issues and had expressed opposition to a previous appellate court ruling that favored the state.

The concertina wire spanning approximately 30 miles (48 kilometers) along the Rio Grande near Eagle Pass is a component of Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s broader stance against the administration’s immigration enforcement. Governor Abbott has also granted authorization for the installation of floating barriers in the Rio Grande near Eagle Pass, as well as the arrest and detention of numerous migrants on trespassing charges by troopers. The administration has taken legal action to challenge these measures in federal court.

Recently, a federal appeals court compelled federal agents to cease cutting the concertina wire. Notably, a significant number of migrants have been crossing at Eagle Pass in recent months.

According to court documents, the administration argues that the wire obstructs Border Patrol agents from reaching migrants as they traverse the river. Furthermore, they assert that federal immigration law supersedes Texas’ efforts to curb the influx of migrants into the country.

Texas officials contend that federal agents cut the wire to facilitate the apprehension and processing of groups crossing the river unlawfully.

In the vote, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor aligned with the administration’s position. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Clarence Thomas sided with Texas.

No explanations were provided for the justices’ respective votes.

The resurfacing of a damning report alleges that President Joe Biden exerted pressure on Attorney General Merrick Garland to pursue legal action against former President Donald Trump. Originally published by The New York Times on April 02, 2022, the report has gained renewed attention on X, formerly known as Twitter, due to the increasing number of legal cases against the previous administration.

“The attorney general’s deliberative approach has come to frustrate Democratic allies of the White House and, at times, President Biden himself,” New York Times reporters Katie Benner, Katie Rogers, and Michael S. Schmidt said. “As recently as late last year, Mr. Biden confided to his inner circle that he believed former President Donald J. Trump was a threat to democracy and should be prosecuted, according to two people familiar with his comments.”

“And while the president has never communicated his frustrations directly to Mr. Garland, he has said privately that he wanted Mr. Garland to act less like a ponderous judge and more like a prosecutor who is willing to take decisive action over the events of Jan. 6,” it said.

In the wake of the story’s publication, four prosecutors have brought forth 91 charges against the ex-president, potentially subjecting him to a staggering 717.5 years of imprisonment. Recently, a journalist inquired the president about his stance on whether Trump could be deemed an insurrectionist.

“Is Trump an insurrectionist, sir?” the reporter said.

“I think … it’s self-evident,” the president said. “Whether the Fourteenth Amendment applies, we’ll let the Court make that decision.”

“But he certainly supported an insurrection,” the president said, though the former president has never been charged with insurrection. “No question about it. None. Zero.”

The banishment of former President Donald Trump from the primary ballot in Colorado, as ruled by the state’s Supreme Court, has raised concerns for Newt Gingrich, the former Republican Speaker of the House and Fox News contributor. During his appearance on the Fox News show “The Ingraham Angle,” Gingrich expressed his belief that this decision could have dire consequences not only for the upcoming 2024 election but also for the overall future of elections in the United States.

“I think this is potentially catastrophic,” he said. “1,360,000 Coloradans voted for Donald Trump in the last election. Four lawyers want to block him from being on the ballot. That means, basically, for every 340,000 Coloradans who voted for Trump, one lawyer is stopping them. That’s a level of establishment arrogance that is not sustainable.

“The last great effort like this was the 10 states that refused to put Abraham Lincoln on the ballot in 1860,” the former Speaker said. “The American people are not going to tolerate, and I hope the Supreme Court fully understands. The American people are not going to tolerate being told that they are not allowed to have a choice for who they want to have as president.

“This is not Venezuela. It’s not Nicaragua. It’s not Cuba. I think the Democrats are dangerously close to causing the kind of confrontation that would be truly disastrous for the country,” he said in a stunning prediction before host Laura Ingraham played a clip of Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick saying that Texas could keep President Joe Biden off the 2024 ballot for how he has handled the border.

“Seeing what happened in Colorado tonight, Laura, makes me think — except we believe in democracy in Texas — maybe we should take Joe Biden off the ballot in Texas for allowing 8 million people to cross the border since he’s been president, disrupting our state far more than anything anyone else has done in recent history,” Patrick said in a video clip Ingraham played from her show the night before, to which Gingrich agreed.

“I mean, look at what has happened to America with this open border. That in and of itself is its own type of insurrection against sovereignty, against the rule of law. So is this not a natural reaction if this is the precedent they set?” the host said.

“Yes,” the former Speaker said. “Look, Biden’s illegal immigration policy, which leads to Biden’s illegal immigrants, is a disaster, and it’s deliberate. It’s not — there is not a failure on the border.

“There is a deliberate policy on the border to maximize the number of people who come in. The next stage will be for the left to demand that they be allowed to vote even though they are here illegally. You can see the whole process,” he said. “And that’s why we are, I think, moving dangerously close to a really genuine confrontation other than the very nature of America.”

Tucker Carlson, the ex-Fox News anchor known for his accurate insights, has made a concerning forecast regarding the upcoming 2024 presidential election, which has garnered attention. In a recent gathering, Carlson acknowledged the prevailing sentiment of anger and paranoia among the people he has interacted with. He emphasized that these individuals are not inclined towards conspiracy theories but rather ordinary citizens expressing genuine concerns about the current state of affairs in the nation.

“I flew out here across the country this morning and spent five hours texting people … and I gotta tell you, every single person I texted, except my wife — who’s not on the internet at all — was angry and paranoid,” Carlson said.

“Seriously, and these are not crazy people. These are normal good people with like kids and stuff. With a vested interest in Americans’ success. These are not the burn-it-down caucus. These are the, you know, these are the people you want voting,” he added.

Furthermore, Carlson underscored that, based on his evaluation of their perspectives, he considers their emotions to be entirely warranted. He drew attention to the mounting strain within the United States, envisioning its possible amplification as the nation nears an impassioned election season in the forthcoming year.

“And I have to say, after assessing their views for five hours, I think they were justified in both. They had every reason to be angry and all the evidence required to become paranoid,” Carlson added. “I’m just telling you once again, what you already know, which is, this is going to be — the next year is going to be, I think I’d bet my house on it, really like nothing we’ve ever seen in the country. And everyone can kind of feel that. You know, most of our perceptions come through intuition rather than reason.”

“But if you’re close to your dog, you know, the dog knows exactly what’s going on … they just watch and they feel. And people are very much the same. And if something bad is about to happen, everybody gets jumpy. And everybody’s really jumpy right now,” Carlson said.

Carlson provided a series of recommendations for the upcoming months, underscoring the importance of keeping up with political advancements. He brought up President Joe Biden’s cognitive state and stressed the legal accusations against former President Donald Trump. Additionally, Carlson alluded to prevailing societal concerns, including gender ideology, as subjects that require careful consideration.

“Your gut is the one thing that doesn’t lie to you. Your gut only has your interest in mind. It is not trying to sell you a product or convince you to vote for it,” he said.

“If you feel like you’re being lied to, you’re 100 percent right — you are being lied to. And if you feel like something very intense in history is about to happen, don’t ignore it. Don’t panic. There’s no profit in that, you can’t control it — you’re not in charge of history,” Carlson added, highlighting that there is “similar volatility” in politics happening across the world, most especially throughout the West.

“You’ve got two people running for president — one of them is literally senile,” Carlson added, noting further that he thinks Biden is “not running” the show at the White House. “Yet he’s standing for reelection at the age of 80.”

Carlson then shifted to Trump’s pending court cases: “Every time he gets indicted and every time they tack years onto this potential sentence, he becomes more popular — and now he’s winning.”

“Nothing that is happening now or that has happened for the last five or six years can be explained through conventional political terms,” he said.

Jesse Watters, the Fox News host, has put forward a disturbing hypothesis regarding the treatment of former President Donald Trump in the courts. During a recent episode, Watters pointed to the recent decision by the Colorado Supreme Court to exclude Trump from the 2024 Republican primary ballot. He suggested that this action, along with the potential exclusion from the general election ballot if Trump becomes the nominee, is an intentional move by Democrats to incite criminal behavior among Trump supporters.

“Five years after the Civil War, pro-slavery Democrats filled the halls of Congress, and 15 years later, pro-slavery Confederates actually flipped the House – 51 former Confederate soldiers or officials were elected into office,” he said. “Even the vice president of the Confederacy, Alexander Stephens, an arch-secessionist, landed a seat in Congress.

“Another Confederate rebel, Lucius Lamar – great name – who literally drafted the Missouri secession plan, went on to serve as interior secretary and was later appointed to the Supreme Court,” the host said.

“But how is that possible? Because all week we’ve been hearing how the Constitution bans insurrectionists from office. The 14th Amendment. How would Confederate soldiers be allowed to serve in government but not Donald Trump?” he said.

“Well, it turns out Congress eviscerated the 14th Amendment 150 years ago because President Ulysses S Grant believed national unity and reconciliation after the Civil War was more important than holding a grudge,” the host said. “This law has been hollowed out and has been sitting on the back burner for years. Well, that is until Donald Trump came along.

“Every time Trump’s arrested, he becomes more powerful in the eyes of the voters. What’s going to happen when they take him off the ballot? They’re turning Trump into the greatest political underdog America’s ever witnessed. They’re setting up the greatest comeback story in American political history,” he said.

“They say they’re protecting us from danger, but Trump’s not a danger to us, he’s a danger to them,” he said. “And Americans are starting to ask themselves why. It feels like the left wants violence because that’s where this is going. We’re being baited, so their actions are justified. That’s how it feels. The more the left overplays their hand, the scarier this gets.”

WATCH:

Democrats want to “remove” Donald Trump and if he’s not removed, there will be a civil war pic.twitter.com/MkODtM4ni7

— Jesse Watters (@JesseBWatters) December 22, 2023

The previous Speaker did not solely discuss the 2024 election during his appearance on the Fox News program “The Ingraham Angle,” but rather the overall future of elections due to the case.

“I think this is potentially catastrophic,” he said. “1,360,000 Coloradans voted for Donald Trump in the last election. Four lawyers want to block him from being on the ballot. That means, basically, for every 340,000 Coloradans who voted for Trump, one lawyer is stopping them. That’s a level of establishment arrogance that is not sustainable.

“The last great effort like this was the 10 states that refused to put Abraham Lincoln on the ballot in 1860,” the former Speaker said. “The American people are not going to tolerate, and I hope the Supreme Court fully understands. The American people are not going to tolerate being told that they are not allowed to have a choice for who they want to have as president.

“I mean, look at what has happened to America with this open border. That in and of itself is its own type of insurrection against sovereignty, against the rule of law. So is this not a natural reaction if this is the precedent they set?” the host said.

“Yes,” the former Speaker said. “Look, Biden’s illegal immigration policy, which leads to Biden’s illegal immigrants, is a disaster, and it’s deliberate. It’s not — there is not a failure on the border.

“There is a deliberate policy on the border to maximize the number of people who come in. The next stage will be for the left to demand that they be allowed to vote even though they are here illegally. You can see the whole process,” he said. “And that’s why we are, I think, moving dangerously close to a really genuine confrontation over the very nature of America.”

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, intends to interrogate the former prosecutor of Hunter Biden regarding the investigation’s management and the choice to let the statute of limitations expire for specific tax years linked to Hunter’s earnings from the Ukrainian energy company, Burisma.

During an interview with Fox News, the Ohio Republican emphasized that Hunter had received substantial payments from the company, raising apprehensions about potential associations between Burisma, President Joe Biden, and the White House.

“Lesley Wolf, assistant U.S. Attorney for the DOJ out of Wilmington, Delaware, is part of a five-year investigation into Hunter Biden. Served with David Weiss. Allegedly deviated from the protocol for preferential treatment—that’s the allegation. And is known to be a Democratic campaign donor, Leslie Wolf. How could one person hold all of this up? Is it that simple?” host Bill Hemmer asked.

“Well, I think it was the whole investigation. As you pointed out, Bill, it took them five years and is still ongoing. It’s now special counsel David Weiss. Lesley Wolf, according to whistleblowers, is the lady who said we’re not going to look into campaign finance concerns that Mr. Shapley, Mr. Ziegler, and others of the investigative team thought should be examined,” Jordan responded.

“She’s the one who said you can’t use the term Big Guy when you do any interviews. You can’t talk about ‘Political Figure Number One’, who we all know was Joe Biden. So we want to ask her questions about all that, and maybe most importantly, why did the investigation decide to let the tax years 2014 and 2015, when the bulk of the Burisma income was coming to Hunter Biden? Why did they let the statute of limitations lapse for those years?” Jordan said.

He continued: “My theory is that when you get into Burisma, you get to the White House. It is one thing to charge Hunter Biden with a gun charge in Delaware. That doesn’t even involve Joe Biden. But when you get into Burisma, it does because this is a Ukrainian energy company that paid Hunter Biden so much money. So we want to ask her some questions about that as well.”

In the meantime, an oversight investigation has been initiated by Jordan into U.S. intelligence agencies for allegedly impeding a Senate investigation regarding the Biden family in 2020.

On Wednesday, Jordan sent a letter to Avril Haines, the National Intelligence Director, stating that the House Judiciary Committee and its subcommittee are currently examining claims that the U.S. Intelligence Community obstructed a congressional inquiry in 2020 by falsely accusing two U.S. Senators of promoting Russian ‘disinformation.’

Senators Ron Johnson (R., Wis.) and Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) had initiated a congressional investigation three years ago into allegations of influence peddling involving President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden. On August 6, 2020, two FBI officials provided the Republican lawmakers with a “defensive” briefing as part of their investigation, characterizing those allegations as misinformation from Russia.

At that time, Grassley and Johnson were close to completing their September 2020 report on Hunter Biden’s alleged influence-peddling schemes in China and Ukraine, as reported by National Review.

Jordan is now requesting that Haines provide all versions of the briefing script that were used to inform the two senators, seeking information about the so-called ‘defensive’ briefing.

In his letter, Jordan stated, “The Senators’ investigation into Hunter Biden’s financial ties to foreign governments and individuals was hindered by the briefing, the existence of which was later leaked.”

According to a letter later written by Grassley and Johnson to Nikki Floris, the then-Deputy Assistant Director for Counterintelligence, and Bradley Benavides, the then-Section Chief of the Foreign Influence Task Force, the Russian disinformation briefing received by the two FBI officials primarily consisted of information that the Senators were already aware of and information unrelated to their investigation into Biden.

Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie will not be included in the Super Tuesday primary in Maine, as state officials have confirmed that he did not meet the qualifications to be on the ballot. Despite the campaign’s efforts to appeal the decision, a Maine Superior Court judge has upheld the Secretary of State’s ruling on the matter.

“We appreciate that the court upheld the integrity of Maine’s well-established ballot access requirements,” Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows said in a statement. “Every candidate, including presidential candidates, must follow the law to qualify for the ballot. We are glad that the court recognized that Maine law is workable and fair to all.”

In December, a letter from Maine Director of Elections Heidi M. Peckham informed Christie’s campaign that they had only submitted 844 certified signatures, falling short of the required minimum of 2,000 signatures needed to be placed on the ballot.

In response, a spokesperson for Christie’s campaign claimed that they had actually gathered 6,000 signatures and argued that the issue was a procedural one in the review process, which they were appealing.

However, the state court disagreed with this argument.

Following the court’s ruling, a spokesperson for Christie’s campaign stated to CBS News that they disagreed with the decision and were currently assessing their options.

Maine Superior Court Justice Julia M. Lipez ruled that Christie had failed to separate petition forms by town, as instructed by the Secretary, or alternatively, failed to allow enough time to submit the multi-town signature sheets to the relevant municipalities before the November 20 deadline.

Despite this setback, Christie still has the option to file as a write-in candidate, with a deadline of December 26 to do so.

As the most vocal critic of former President Donald Trump, who is currently the leading contender for the 2024 GOP nomination, Christie has become a target for conservatives who support Trump’s “America First” agenda.

Recently, after co-moderating the most recent 2024 GOP presidential debate, former Fox News star and top-rated SiriusXM podcaster Megyn Kelly admitted that she had prayed for Christie to qualify for the debate so she could ask him a crucial question on stage.

Kelly expressed her desire to question Christie about his stance on allowing permanent medical and surgical interventions for minor children who are experiencing gender confusion.

“You do not favor a ban on trans medical treatments for minors, saying it’s a parental rights issue,” Kelly began, setting up her question at the NewsNation-hosted event.

“The surgeries done on minors involve cutting off body parts at a time when these kids cannot even legally smoke a cigarette. Kids who go from puberty blockers to cross-sex hormones are at a much greater likelihood of winding up sterile,” she added.

“How is it that you think a parent should be able to OK these surgeries — never mind the sterilization of a child — and aren’t you way too out of step on this issue to be the Republican nominee?” she asked.

“No, I’m not, because Republicans believe in less government, not more, and less involvement with government, not more involvement in people’s lives,” Christie began.

“And you know what, Megyn? I trust parents,” Christie, a former U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, continued.

“And we’re out there saying that we should empower parents in education, we should empower parents to make more decisions about where their kids go to school — I agree,” Christie said.

“We should empower parents to be teaching the values that they believe in in their homes without the government telling them what those values should be,” he noted further, adding that his position comes “as a father of four” children.

Christie then said that “every once in a while, parents are going to make decisions that we disagree with” but then said, “The minute you start to take those rights away from parents, you don’t know that slippery slope, what rights are going to be taken away next.”

Ron DeSantis was then quick to attack his position:

As a parent, you do not have the right to abuse your kids. pic.twitter.com/HgJ4qhTJp2

— Ron DeSantis (@RonDeSantis) December 7, 2023

A remarkable revelation regarding President Joe Biden is unlikely to sway undecided Americans in their support for him in the upcoming election. As stated by Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) during Turning Point USA’s annual AmericaFest event on Tuesday, Biden’s aides have recently implemented additional safety measures for the president’s travel.

“Listen, we have a president of the United States [whose] team carries extra pairs of pants with him when he travels in case he has poopy pants,” Cruz said, as noted in a viral clip posted online.

“Big and stinky if true,” conservative influencer Collin Rugg said in an X post containing the clip.

According to The Western Journal, however, that was only half of Cruz’s statement.

“I want you to pause and think how the enemies of America are feeling,” the senator continued, setting up a punchline for a joke: “Eh, depends.”

Growing concerns among Americans about President Biden’s advanced age have been evident for months, given that he is now 81 years old, making him the oldest president in history. These concerns primarily revolve around his cognitive abilities, as he appears to be facing increasing struggles in this regard.

A recent incident further fueled these concerns. At a public event last month, Biden failed to provide any assistance or reassurance to voters when he couldn’t recall the name of a reporter. This incident took place during a press conference in Woodside, Calif., while he was engaged in discussions with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Biden openly admitted that he had been instructed to call on a reporter from CBS News but confessed that he couldn’t recall the journalist’s name.

“I’m embarrassed,” Biden said, looking down at cue cards, which he frequently uses. “I think it’s CBS, but I can’t remember who at CBS. And I’m sorry.”

BIDEN: "I'm embarrassed. I think it's CBS, but I can't remember who at CBS. Uhh…" pic.twitter.com/DFknUcQimS

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) November 16, 2023

Furthermore, the Republican National Committee’s research division recently released a video montage of Biden, which portrays a concerning image of a commander-in-chief experiencing a deteriorating mental capacity.

This is Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.

He’s not playing with a full deck.

Sad!pic.twitter.com/IfPgIiJFmE

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) November 13, 2023

In the realm of battleground states, Former President Donald Trump has taken the lead over Biden in five out of six states, with substantial margins. This shift can be attributed to black voters switching parties and the concerns of many regarding the current president’s age.

“Trump leads Biden by a whopping 10 points in Nevada, six points in Georgia, five points in both Arizona and Michigan, and four points in Pennsylvania. Biden’s sole lead is in Wisconsin, where he beats Trump by two points,” Fox News reported, citing a New York Times-Siena College poll released earlier this month.

Trump had won those before, but now his lead dominates where the polls were at in 2020.

Fox News adds:

“The polling attributes Biden’s poor showing to a devastating lack of confidence due to his age. Voters said they trusted Trump to better handle the economy, foreign policy and immigration.

Trump’s performance also came thanks to unprecedented levels of support from black voters, with a record 22% of the demographic siding with him over Biden across the six states, according to NYT.

Trump currently holds a commanding lead in the 2024 Republican Presidential primary, with his closest competitors dozens of points below him.”

“The Outlaws” podcast co-host Darvio Morrow took to the X platform to note that, according to the polling data, Trump got 22 percent of the black vote in the poll.

“Black voters — long a bulwark for Democrats and for Mr. Biden — are now registering 22 percent support in these states for Mr. Trump, a level unseen in presidential politics for a Republican in modern times,” he quoted the Times as saying.

Sources who spoke to NBC revealed that during their recent summit in San Francisco, Chinese President Xi Jinping conveyed a warning to President Joe Biden. President Xi Jinping expressed his intention to eventually incorporate Taiwan, even if it required the use of force.

Xi specifically told Biden that China would take Taiwan but did not say exactly when. The Chinese leader added during “a group meeting attended by a dozen American and Chinese officials that China’s preference is to take Taiwan peacefully, not by force,” NBC News reported.

During the meeting, the Chinese leader also discussed the public forecasts made by U.S. military leaders regarding Xi’s alleged plans to annex Taiwan in either 2025 or 2027. According to two current officials and one former official who were briefed on the meeting, Xi clarified that these predictions were inaccurate as he had not specified a specific timeframe for such actions.

Prior to the summit, Chinese officials had requested that Biden publicly affirm the U.S.’s support for China’s peaceful reunification with Taiwan and its non-endorsement of Taiwanese independence. However, the White House declined this request, as reported by NBC News.

The newly disclosed information provides insight into a crucial meeting between the two leaders, which aimed to alleviate tensions between their respective nations.

NBC News also reported: “Xi’s private warning to Biden, while not markedly different from his past public comments on reunifying Taiwan, got the attention of U.S. officials because it was delivered at a time when China’s behavior toward Taiwan is seen as increasingly aggressive and ahead of a potentially pivotal presidential election in the self-governing democratic island next month.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) called on Democrats and Republicans to unify in an effort to fight back against China.

“This story as reported is beyond unnerving,” Graham said. “I will be working with Democratic and Republican Senators to do two things quickly. First, create a robust defense supplemental for Taiwan and second, draft pre-invasion sanctions from hell to impose on China if they take action to seize Taiwan.”

According to reports, the Chinese leader’s tone was blunt, though not exactly confrontational.

“His language was no different than what he has always said. He is always tough on Taiwan. He’s always had a tough line,” said one U.S. official who is familiar with the exchange.

During the Chinese Communist Party Congress held last year, Xi made a public announcement stating that China would employ military action against Taiwan in the event of its declaration of independence with external backing. He further emphasized that this use of force is specifically aimed at countering interference from foreign entities and a small group of separatists advocating for Taiwanese independence.

“Xi, who has set a goal of doubling the size of the Chinese economy by 2035, also said that ‘we must continue to pursue economic development as our central task.’ Some experts believe it is doubtful that China would attack Taiwan if it does not declare independence because a military conflict would likely prevent Beijing from reaching its economic goals,” NBC News reported..

The White House then went on to say – “We’re in a competitive relationship, China and the United States, but my responsibility is to make this rational and manageable, so it doesn’t result in conflict,” Biden said. “That’s what I’m all about. That’s what this is about.”

The U.S. CIA Director reported earlier that Xi has directed his military to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. “Now, that does not mean that he’s decided to conduct an invasion in 2027, or any other year, but it’s a reminder of the seriousness of his focus and his ambition,” Burns added.

Florida Republican Representative Byron Donalds strongly criticized Hillary Clinton for her recent remarks, in which she referred to numerous members of the Republican Party as a “cult” for their support of former President Donald Trump.

“How do you feel about being told you’re in a cult?” Donalds was asked.

“I stopped caring about what Hillary Clinton had to say long ago because she lost a long, long time ago,” Donalds replied. “And she’s largely irrelevant as far as I’m concerned. But to a broader level, since Hillary wants to engage, allow me to engage,” Donalds began.

“You lied multiple times, you destroyed emails, you destroyed evidence, and then you laundered phony information that you knew was phony into the intelligence community because you were scared you were going to lose,” Donalds added. “You did all this and you still lost, so I’m not going to listen to Hillary Clinton about who I should and should not support.”

“She has lied to the American people repeatedly. She used our government to spy on the campaign of one of her opponents. Yes, America, she did that. So if people like talking about Watergate and Nixon, look no further than Hillary Clinton and the Crossfire Hurricane.”

Sunny Hostin, one of the co-hosts on the popular talk show “The View,” inquired about Clinton’s perspective on the potential outcomes of a second term for Trump in the Oval Office.

“I can’t even think of that. Because I think it would be the end of our country as we know it,” Clinton began. “And I don’t say that lightly.”

Hillary then went on to claim that she advocated for giving Trump after losing the 2016 election.

“You know, I hated losing. And I especially hated losing to him because I had seen some of the warning signals during the campaign,” Clinton continued. “But I immediately said, ‘Look, we have to give him a chance; we’ve got to support, you know, the president we have,’ and I meant it.”

But in reality Clinton called Trump an “illegitimate president” for YEARS.

“I tried really hard, but then literally from his inauguration on, it was nothing but, you know, accusing people of things, making up facts,” she added. “Everything that I worried about I saw unfolding, and so I think that he’d be even worse now because he was somewhat restrained—believe it or not—in the first term by people who he hired because he thought they would go along with him and they stood up to him.”

It is difficult to fathom that in the event of Clinton assuming the presidency, she would tolerate appointees who fundamentally opposed her policies, a departure from the practices of previous presidents in the contemporary era.

She continued: “Now, he’s going to—if he were ever near the Oval Office again—find people who have no principles, no conscience, who are totally tied to his fortunes, literally, and therefore would do whatever he said. And so the wreckage is almost unimaginable.”

Clinton subsequently proceeded to assert that emerging authoritarians would subsequently proceed to “close off” and incarcerate political adversaries, similar to how Democratic governors implemented lockdown measures in their respective states during the COVID pandemic and how the Biden administration has detained Jan. 6 Capitol protesters for extended periods without affording them trials.

“You know, when I was secretary of state, I used to talk about one and done, and what I meant by that is that people would get legitimately elected, and then they would try to do away with elections, and do away with opposition, and so away with a free press, and you could see it in certain countries,” Clinton said.

“Trump is telling us what he intends to do,” Clinton said, adding, “Take him at his word.”