A condescending editorial in the Los Angeles Times states that men have the right to display their “male-appearing genitalia” to women and children in health spas, as long as they say they are transgender women.
The editorial from July 6th supporting transgender display said:
As complicated as the opposing beliefs might be, it is clear where the rights in this matter land. Everyone — transgender customers, members of every faith, and women who are upset by the sight of penises — all have the right to use the spa and other public accommodations.”
The paper’s statement intends to denounce the widespread criticism of a man claiming transgender status. At the same time, he displayed his male genitals at a Korean-style spa for women and girls in Los Angeles.
The dispute arose after a black Christian woman would not be silenced by the elite’s intense pressure. She took to her Twitter account to denounce the man, the spa’s management, and the anti-privacy law of the state. On July 7th, the women held a press conference at her church, and only minimal publicity was received from the pro-transgender reporters and editors:
I went to the Wi spa in Los Angeles, California, and while I decided to go around the different jacuzzis, I decided to take a nap. After my nap, I got up, and I wanted to get water. As I was walking, I noticed something that really was disturbing, something that caused me to feel that I must have been transported into the men’s locker room, the men’s Jacuzzi area.
Yeah. A man, a full-on man, fully naked, completely exposed, showing his testicles, his penis. Slightly erected.
I was appalled at what I saw. This was not normal. I’m in a safe place. But now I’m not. Little girls are there, their mothers are there, other women are looking about, and they begin to put their robes back on them. I went to management. Management did nothing. I even told the guy he should leave, “This is not right,” and he didn’t leave. We had no help whatsoever. I did not know what to do.
Something has got to be done. This is not fair. It is not right. We as women have the right to be safe in public spaces, and they are being violated by men going into women’s spaces, claiming to be women to gain access so that they can exercise their perversions.
This is not right. We must do something about it.
On June 23, I experienced what no woman or little girl should ever experience. I experienced what used to be called flashing or indecent exposure, which would result in a man registering to be a sexual offender for life.
She also sued an ally’s Instagram to make her case.
The elite editorial board of the newspaper dismissed her concerns as bigotry and hinted she deserved criticism as she brought her Christian views into the public eye.
Progressives tolerate minority religions in most culture-war debates as the elites want to divide Americans first before fracturing the power of mainstream norms and ideas.
The ordinary people break when forced to accept humiliations, such as the Los Angeles Time’s ridicules the public opposition of displaying male genitalia in front of women and girls.
The editorial said:
[Not] everyone who feels uncomfortable in such scenarios [is] a bigot. There are women who have been through personal experiences such as sexual assault who might find such a situation intimidating. It could go against the convictions and traditions of observant Muslims and Jews, who have a conservative or orthodox interpretation of gender norms and might themselves feel marginalized for their traditionalist beliefs.
The woman posted on her webpage:
CubanaAngel calls on anyone outraged by the unjust laws passed in the state of California that fail to protect women and girls in public spaces to stand with her. The goal is to repeal the laws and to vote against legislators who do not believe the rights of women and little girls should be protected.
“California’s Civil Code, Section 51, is an unjust law masquerading as an anti-discrimination law that disregards grandmothers, mothers, wives, and little girls,” CubanaAngel said. “This is not right. We are sacrificing the safety of women and children, and I am not afraid to speak,” she added.
The newspaper’s editorial shows the pro-transgender placards left by Antifa groups who attacked, injured, and dispersed a demonstration of peaceful people supporting single-sex spas. The city police did not protect the right to protest for the reservation of sexual privacy.
“I want to be there … [but] it is not in my best interest to be there,” said the woman who first raised the concerns.
The Time’s editorial board avoided reporting who instigated the attacks outside the spa: “That this led to violence outside as opponents and supporters of the law clashed over the weekend.”
The Los Angeles Times rooted their own horn by declaring, “Freedom is our core value. We feel a special obligation to defend civil liberties and human rights.”
The newspaper did not acknowledge the known risks of claimed transgender status – the health risk from drugs, hormones, surgery, the sexual and social isolation of people who claim to be transgender, or the alternative mental health sources of the teenagers’ claims.
The public wants to protect their kids from transgender activists, from medical risks, and the social isolation of transgender identity, as shown in numerous polls.
The opposition is fueling mainstream support for state legislation to protect children from further damage in many states. A May 2021 Gallup poll, for example, showed 62 percent to 34 percent opposition to transgender entry into women’s sports. Even the National Republican Senatorial Committee, run by Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL), noted that one of its April polls of Latino voters showed 51 percent strong opposition to just 15 percent strong support for the demand that transgender boys be allowed to play in girls’ athletics.