There has been widespread discussion on social media regarding a service member spotted holding a Chinese flag at the APEC Summit meeting in San Francisco, sparking significant outrage.

Renowned conservative actor James Woods expressed his concern, stating, “My father fought in the Korean War. I miss him with all my heart, yet I am grateful he never had to see an American serviceman holding a communist Chinese flag.”

Many Americans were appalled at the sight of a member of the Armed Forces seemingly honoring the Communist regime, known for the deaths of millions of innocent people.

Former NYPD Commissioner Bernard Kerik questioned, “Why is an American soldier holding a communist Chinese flag?”

According to Department of Defense guidelines, it is against regulations for service members in uniform and in an official capacity to carry flags of foreign nations, veterans’ groups, or other non-military organizations.

The incident prompted strong reactions from citizens, with one expressing, “Unbelievable. The leadership of Biden is pro any country but America. Every American should be outraged.”

Earlier during the visit, numerous San Francisco streets displayed the Chinese flag, with no American flags in sight, creating a perception as if the Bay Area had been invaded and conquered.

The image of a member of the military in full uniform holding the flag of an adversary stirred comparisons to a modern-day version of Red Dawn.

Elected officials in New Jersey will no longer be required to pledge an oath to Almighty God, as the state has agreed to modify its traditional oath of office following a federal lawsuit filed by a Wisconsin-based atheist group.

James Tosone, a non-theist planning to run for Congress in 2024 as a Libertarian, faced challenges due to the religious language in the petition required for candidates running for office in New Jersey. The phrase “so help me, God” posed a conflict for Tosone, preventing him from verifying his candidacy forms with a secular affirmation.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation, co-led by Annie Laurie Gaylor, contested this requirement, describing it as a violation of freedom of conscience and an outdated practice. The state swiftly responded by amending its stance and providing guidance on secular affirmations to all New Jersey clerks.

Expressing satisfaction with the state’s response, Tosone remarked, “I’m very happy with the state’s response to my lawsuit and their commitment to follow the Constitution’s ‘no religious test for public office.'”

Gaylor added, “We’re glad that the state of New Jersey saw the error of its stubbornly noninclusive ways,” emphasizing that residents will no longer face a choice between dishonesty or abstaining from running for office.

Regarding the concern about who Tosone might swear to in the absence of religious beliefs, the article humorously suggests possibilities like his pet cat or a shrubbery. It concludes by noting the potential dilemma atheists would face if the case had gone to trial, given the typical requirement for witnesses to affirm their commitment to truth with the phrase “so help you God.”

Congressman George Santos (R-NY) is encountering renewed demands for his resignation following the release of a damning ethics report on Thursday.

The House Ethics Committee made its findings public, accusing Santos of utilizing campaign funds for personal purposes and engaging in fraudulent conduct, among other charges.

In response to the report, Santos issued an extensive statement to defend himself.

Additionally, he is advocating for a constitutional convention under Article V.

If there was a single ounce of ETHICS in the “Ethics committee”, they would have not released this biased report. The Committee went to extraordinary lengths to smear myself and my legal team about me not being forthcoming (My legal bills suggest otherwise).

It is a disgusting…

— George Santos (@MrSantosNY) November 16, 2023

President Donald Trump is requesting a mistrial in the Democrats’ civil “fraud” case against him in New York. On Wednesday, Trump’s legal team pointed to “tangible and overwhelming” evidence of bias.

In a 30-page motion, Trump alleges that Judge Arthur Engoron participated in extrajudicial activities, including making public comments during the trial and improperly “co-judging” with his law clerk Allison Greenfield. Trump’s lawyers highlight Greenfield’s involvement in “extensive, public partisan activities.”

Trump also criticized the gag orders issued by Engoron, which prevent Trump and others from publicly discussing his staff members, suggesting that these orders were imposed to prevent these matters from becoming public.

“Such evidence, coupled with an unprecedented departure from standard judicial procedure, has tainted these proceedings and a mistrial is warranted,” his lawyers said.

“Specifically, the Court’s own conduct, coupled with the Principal Law Clerk, Allison Greenfield’s (‘Principal Law Clerk’) unprecedented role in the trial and extensive, public partisan activities, would cause even a casual observer to question the Court’s partiality.”

“Thus, only the grant of a mistrial can salvage what is left of the rule of law,” the motion continues.

NEW: Motion for Mistrial in Letitia James’ fraudulent civil case against President Trump

“There can be no doubt of the public perception of bias in this case…only the grant of a mistrial can salvage what is left of the rule of law.” pic.twitter.com/qJ3jhQqXcc

— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) November 15, 2023

In early October, Engoron implemented a gag order on Trump following a Truth Social post in which Trump referred to Greenfield as the “girlfriend” of Democrat Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY).

As a consequence of violating the order, the judge imposed fines of $5,000 and $10,000.

“The gag orders and the enforcement thereof reveal the Court has christened itself camera stellata: judge, jury, and executioner, proceeding sua sponte to act against President Trump in violation of the Constitution, the Judiciary Law, and First Department rules,” Trump’s lawyers argue.

“This Star Chamber approach is particularly indefensible when the gag orders actually shield the Court itself from public criticism for perceived bias —one of the most fundamental rights under the First Amendment.”

Greenfield, he points out, contributed more than “$3,000 to Democrat candidates and organizations in 2022 and over $900 in 2023,” surpassing the $500 limit permitted for court staff in a single year.

Trump raised concerns about Engoron allowing her to “preside on the bench with him to his right-hand side” during all proceedings.

Additionally, Trump alleged that Engoron’s public sharing of links to articles “disparaging parties and counsel” on the Wheatley School newsletter he manages violates the Code of Judicial Conduct’s prohibition on publicly commenting about a pending case.

During testimony on the witness stand earlier this month, Trump criticized the case as a “political witch hunt” and denounced Engoron’s earlier ruling that he had deceived banks and insurance companies by inflating the value of his net worth as “fraudulent.”

The demand for a mistrial comes in the wake of a video showing Democrat New York Attorney General Letitia James smirking as Don Trump Jr. appeared in court.

President Trump responded strongly to the video, accusing James and her allies of “election interference.”

A well-known legal scholar and expert on the First Amendment has strongly criticized former President Barack Obama’s recent statements regarding “free speech.”

Obama has faced widespread criticism for attempting to position himself as a champion of free speech.

The former president described himself as nearly absolutist on the First Amendment during a recent interview.

“I’m close to a First Amendment absolutist in the sense that I generally don’t believe that even offensive speech, mean speech, etcetera, it should be certainly not regulated by the government.”

“Absolute nonsense,” George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley fired back.

Turley, a constitutional scholar, has provided testimony on numerous occasions before Congress on matters concerning the U.S. Constitution.

He has also served as legal representation for members of Congress in various court cases.

“While claiming to be a First Amendment [near] absolutist, Obama has supported massive censorship on social media and called for the media to frame news to better educate citizens and shape public opinion,” Turley explained in a column.

“For those of us in the free speech community, those positions make Obama’s recurring claim nothing short of absolute nonsense.”

“In an interview with The Verge Editor-in-Chief Nilay Patel, former President Barack Obama once again claimed that he is virtually a ‘First Amendment absolutist’ despite supporting censorship for years, including United Nations efforts to criminalize criticism of religion on a global scale,” Turley explained.

“There are aspects of the Obama terms that I have praised, but his record on free speech is not one of them.”

Obama endorsed a United Nations initiative aimed at globally criminalizing any speech perceived by Muslims as derogatory towards Muhammad.

During that period, there were several proposals to criminalize Christians for stating that Muhammad is not a prophet of Allah or expressing similar sentiments.

Although the overall initiative did not succeed, such prosecutions continue in present-day Muslim-majority nations.

Despite his involvement, Obama asserts that he does not support government regulation of even offensive speech.

Turley continues:

“That is virtually identical to prior statements that ‘I’m pretty close to a First Amendment absolutist’ as he was arguing for social media censorship.

“Notably, Obama avoids calling himself a ‘near free speech absolutist.’

“The distinction is key for Obama and others in supporting massive censorship while virtue signaling that they are tolerant of opposing views.”

“The First Amendment is not synonymous with free speech,” the law professor notes.

“It is only a restriction on government action.

“As emphasized by groups like the ACLU, censorship by private companies is also an attack on free speech.

“As I discuss in my new book, The Indispensable Right, the greatest threat today to free speech is the alliance of government, academic, and business interests in censoring speech.”

New York’s Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul has disclosed that the state is implementing surveillance measures in an attempt to address what is termed “hate speech.”

Hochul asserts that the state is engaged in “surveillance efforts” to monitor the social media activities of New Yorkers in order to counteract online “negativity” and “hate speech.”

The governor attributes the collection of data from social media to a surge in anti-Semitic attacks. Hochul shared this information with the media after a meeting with the state’s Jewish leaders, local law enforcement, and federal authorities.

During the subsequent press conference, Hochul outlined her plans to purportedly combat hate crimes.

“It’s painful to me as the governor of this great state — that has been known for its diversity, and how we celebrate different cultures, different religions, different viewpoints — it’s painful to see the cruelty with which New Yorkers are treating each other,” Hochul said.

“Everywhere from college campuses, to our streets, to schools, to playgrounds; even as they’re entering their houses of worship.”

The governor continued by noting that she “immediately deployed the State Police to protect our synagogues and yeshivas and mosques and any other place that could be susceptible to hate crimes or violence.”

“I also announced a significant increase in funding for our efforts: $75 million overall, $50 million for local law enforcement to beef up their efforts as well as $25 million in security grants,” she added.

Since the terrorist attack on Israel on October 7, anti-Semitic hate incidents have witnessed a significant rise across the country.

In New York City, anti-Semitic attacks have surged by almost 331 percent, as reported by data from the New York City Police Department (NYPD).

Hochul proceeded to outline New York’s strategy to identify “incitement to violence” and “direct threats to others” by monitoring social media activity.

“We’re very focused on the data we’re collecting from surveillance efforts – what’s being said on social media platforms.

“And we have launched an effort to be able to counter some of the negativity and reach out to people when we see hate speech being spoken about on online platforms,” Hochul said.

She insists that no New Yorker “should feel they have to hide any indications of what their religious beliefs are.”

Governor Hochul says that New York will now "collect data" and conduct mass surveillance of social media

Re-education camps, here we come

pic.twitter.com/QKLca5FFkP

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) November 14, 2023

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a stark caution to the American people, emphasizing that the United States and Europe could be the next targets if Islamic terrorist groups, particularly HANAT, are not eradicated promptly. Netanyahu delivered this warning during an interview with Fox News’s Sean Hannity.

Netanyahu said:

“We have to win not only for our sake but for the sake of the Middle East, for the sake of our Arab neighbors.

“You know what, for the sake of Gazans who’ve been held by this dark tyranny that has brutalized and brought them nothing but bloodshed and poverty and misery.

“We have to win to protect Israel. We have to win to safeguard the Middle East.

“We have to win for the sake of the civilized world.

“That’s the battle we’re fighting, and it’s being waged right now.

“There is no substitute for that victory.”

“If we don’t win now, then Europe is next and you’re next. And we have to win,” he later added.

Netanyahu stressed that “our fight is your fight.”

He asserts that there is “no substitute for victory.”

“We have to have the forces of civilization beat these barbarians because otherwise this barbarism will spread and will endanger the entire world,” the Israeli leader said.

“Every American, every civilized country will be under peril.

“We have to win. There is no substitute for victory. Total victory.”

Netanyahu called out the “Axis of Terror” which he says is controlled by Iran.

He lists Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the Houthis in Yemen among other “minions” that form the “Axis of Terror.”

“They want to bring the Middle East, the world, back to the Dark Ages,” Netanyahu said.

“And on the other side stands Israel, the modern Arab states, of course the United States, all the forces that want to see peace, prosperity for the Middle East and for the world.

“And that’s the battle that is being waged right now.”

Netanyahu emphasized the support received from President Biden and his administration in Israel’s battle against Hamas. He acknowledged Israel’s compliance with requests to establish safe corridors for Palestinian civilians to exit Gaza and facilitate humanitarian aid.

However, he remained firm on rejecting a ceasefire without the release of hostages, considering it a capitulation to Hamas if captives aren’t returned safely. Netanyahu criticized the “misguided” protesters advocating for a ceasefire, asserting that they do not reflect the sentiments of the majority of Americans.

“We’re not going to be pressed by these demonstrations,” Netanyahu said.

“We’re going to do what’s right and win this war for our sake, for the sake of humanity and civilization.”

WATCH:

20231113 ISRAEL AT WAR | DAY 38
9:00 PM ET
Hannity
– Winston Churchill's "Blood, Toil, Tears And Sweat" Speech of May 13, 1940
– Interview With Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu#IsraelHamasWar #IDF #Israel #Terrorism #IsraelPalestinianWar #IsraelUnderAttack… pic.twitter.com/JtNtx9WteN

— Robert Waloven (@comlabman) November 14, 2023

Democrats are in disarray following a recent report indicating a substantial shift in black voter support away from President Joe Biden as the 2024 election approaches. According to The Wall Street Journal, this historic shift has raised serious concerns among Democrat strategists about Biden’s chances of securing re-election.

A New York Times/Siena College poll earlier this month revealed an unprecedented level of support for former President Donald Trump among black voters in battleground states won by Biden in 2020, including Nevada, Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Black voter support for Trump has risen to 22 percent, up from eight percent in 2020.

In Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, black voters expressed frustration with Biden’s handling of the economy, leading some to reconsider their support for him. A 60-year-old black Democrat voter from southwest Philadelphia, Mahamadou Diallo, criticized Biden, calling him a “weak man” and expressing disappointment in his lack of substantial change. Diallo declared his intention to vote for Trump in a hypothetical rematch.

Another black voter, Michelle Smith, 46, working two jobs in north Philadelphia, expressed disillusionment with Biden due to inflation, higher rent prices, and a feeling of being ignored. Although she voted for Biden in 2020, Smith stated she won’t vote for him again and may abstain from voting altogether.

This erosion of support from black voters has raised alarms among Democrats in battleground states. Concerned elected Democrats acknowledge the gravity of the situation, describing it as a “huge problem.” A May poll indicated that only 41 percent of black adults wanted Biden to run for a second term, with just 55 percent likely to support him in the general election. This contrasts sharply with Biden’s initial high approval among black voters during his first few months in office.

Local Democrat leaders in Philadelphia are conducting efforts to understand the reasons behind black voters leaving the party or withdrawing support for Biden in 2024. Pennsylvania state Sen. Vincent Hughes is reaching out to low-turnout voters in an attempt to encourage a more positive view of Biden’s accomplishments.

Despite these challenges, Biden’s reelection campaign claims to be making significant early investments in black communities. Quentin Fulks, Biden’s deputy campaign manager, emphasizes efforts to attract voters to Biden rather than solely boosting turnout. However, the campaign faces criticism from some quarters, with one official blaming financial problems on “a brick wall of MAGA extremism,” suggesting the need for another four years to combat such challenges.

An attempt to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas faced opposition from eight Republican members, marking a disappointing moment for the GOP.

Those Republicans who voted against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s resolution include Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO), Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA), Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-NC), Rep. John Duarte (R-CA), Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC), Rep. Cliff Bentz (R-OR), and Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH).

The failure to proceed with the impeachment drew criticism, with one House source expressing frustration, stating, “Impeachment of Mayorkas is literally the lowest hanging fruit, and we are messing it up. Some of these people want to have endless hearings and do nothing. I can’t see how [we] can’t deliver one damn win,” as reported by Fox News Channel’s Bill Melugin.

Despite House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) endorsing Greene’s move, emphasizing that voting to impeach Mayorkas is a step toward controlling the border, some Republicans, like Rep. John Duarte (R-Calif.), expressed disinterest in what he termed “peripheral impeachments.” Duarte indicated that decisions on impeachment should be left to Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) and the Judiciary Committee, and he suggested any focus on impeachment should be directed toward President Biden.

The outcome has led to criticism of the Republican Party, with accusations that it has implicitly endorsed the Biden Administration’s open borders policy, contributing to a perception of a lack of action by the party.

The Republican Party has just endorsed the Biden Administration’s open borders policy. What a shameful day, America. What a shameful day.

🚨 BREAKING: 8 House Republicans join Democrats to kill @RepMTG’s resolution to bring articles of impeachment against DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas

-Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO)
-Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) 
-Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA)
-Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-NC) 
-Rep. John Duarte…

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 14, 2023

BREAKING NEWS.🚨🚨

8 House Republicans vote with the Democrats to kill@MTGreenee resolution to impeach DHS Secretary Mayorkas.

“Impeachment of Mayorkas is literally the lowest hanging fruit and we are fu**ing it up. Some of these people want to have endless hearings and do… pic.twitter.com/EOkenq133J

— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) November 14, 2023

(SNews) – Federal prosecutors are planning to make the “client list” of a high-profile trafficking ring public following a major bust this week.

As Slay News reported earlier this week, pharmaceutical executives, professors, doctors, and government officials were busted by authorities during an operation targetting a high-profile sex trafficking ring.

Acting U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Joshua Levy announced the results of the operation and detailed the elite clients involved in this network.

“They are doctors, they are lawyers, they’re accountants, they are executives at high-tech companies, pharmaceutical companies, they’re military officers, government contractors, professors, scientists,” Levy revealed during a press conference.

“Pick a profession, they’re probably represented in this case.”

This commercial sex ring was built on secrecy and exclusivity, catering to wealthy and well-connected clientele,” Levy said in a news conference in Boston.

The three arrested were named as 30-year-old Junmyung Lee of Dedham, 41-year-old Han Lee of Cambridge, and 68-year-old James Lee of Torrance, California.

All three are charged with conspiracy to coerce and entice to travel to engage in illegal sex activity.

Investigators said clients had to fill out a form with their name, work information, email address, phone number, and a reference before they could book appointments.

Customers were then given a “menu” of options by the traffickers.

“Business is booming, until today,” Levy told reporters, adding that the investigation is far from over.

WATCH:

BREAKING: Arrests have been made in a high-profile s*x ring that involved government contractors, professors, military officers, executives at pharmaceutical companies and more.

Will they be protected like Jeffrey Epstein's clients?

The announcement was made by acting U.S.… pic.twitter.com/OkSAcSE1JB

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) November 9, 2023

Despite the arrests of the ring leaders, however, Levy didn’t reveal any further information about the clients.

However, reports are now emerging to suggest that the high-profile client list from the sex trafficking ring is about to be made public by prosecutors.

Many of their names are now in the hands of the Justice Department, the Washington Times is reporting.

“Prosecutors love to go after high-level folks because they can make a name for themselves,” former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told the outlet.

Special Agent Zachary Mitlitsky, the lead investigator, said he believes there are potentially hundreds of “yet to be identified” customers from different professions.

He made a point of explaining why the Justice Department has not named any of the men — yet.

“I do not do this for purposes of maintaining their anonymity, but instead do so because our investigation into their involvement in prostitution is active and ongoing,” Mitlitsky said.

Criminal justice experts say it’s likely federal prosecutors are working on plea agreements in exchange for cooperation from those they have identified as the trafficking ring’s clients.

Additionally, investigative reporter Paul Sperry has revealed:

“Investigators suspect prostitution ring may have been part of Chinese espionage plot targeting high-tech government contracting centers like Cambridge and Tysons Corner.”

DEVELOPING: Investigators suspect prostitution ring may have been part of Chinese espionage plot targeting high-tech government contracting centers like Cambridge and Tysons Corner https://t.co/mLDKen0fLc

— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) November 9, 2023

The Justice Department has confirmed that the investigation is “active and ongoing.”

slaynews.com/news/feds-make-high-profile-client-list-public-major-elite-trafficking-ring-bust/